Overview
Case summary
This case involves a dispute between Shinkle, Wilson & Kreis Co. (plaintiff) and Louisville & N. R. Co. (defendant) regarding questions and considerations related to interstate commerce. The court, per Judge Sage, disposed of the case by following the precedent set in Interstate Commerce Commission v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co., 76 Fed. 183, and issued a decree in accordance with that opinion.
Abstract
The case involves a dispute between a plaintiff company and a defendant railroad company concerning questions related to interstate commerce. The court followed the precedent established in a prior Interstate Commerce Commission case and issued a decree accordingly. The final decree aligns with the opinion from that precedent-setting case.
Opinion of the court
opinionSAGE, District Judge
- The case involves precisely the questions and considerations disposed of in Interstate Commerce Commission v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co., 76 Fed. 183.
- The decree will be in accordance with the opinion in that case.
Legal categories
Case record
Issues & holdings
No issues recorded for this case.
Timeline
No timeline recorded.
Facts & evidence
No factual record available.
Authorities
Cited authorities (1)
Standards & doctrines
- Stare decisis and precedent application
Legal principles applied
- Courts may follow prior decisions to resolve similar cases