Hubbard v. Tod

Nos. 505, 641, and 661
Decided Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Disposition
denied
full scope
Scan to open on mobileScan to open on another device
Court
Circuit court for the Northern district of Iowa and circuit court for the district of Nebraska
Decided
Judge
PER CURIAM
Posture
Decrees entered in equity suits
Appellantss (4)
E. H. Hubbard, assignee of the Union Loan & Trust Company, and the Sioux City, O’Neill & Western Railway Company
John 0. Coombs, William Faxon, Henry J. Taylor
v.
Appelleess (2)
J. Kennedy Tod et al. and Manhattan Trust Company

Overview

The petition for a rehearing in case No. 641 is denied. In cases Nos. 505 and 661, the orders of affirmance are vacated, and the cases are restored to the docket for further orders.

Case summary

This case involves consolidated appeals from equity suits in Iowa and Nebraska circuit courts concerning ownership and redemption rights to bonds of the Sioux City, O’Neill & Western Railway Company. The assignee of Union Loan & Trust Company sought to redeem bonds sold to J. Kennedy Tod & Co., with disputes over ownership and foreclosure. The Circuit Court of Appeals initially affirmed decrees by divided vote. On rehearing petitions, the court denied rehearing in the Iowa case, finding the assignee already had redemption relief under the decree, but granted rehearing in the Nebraska foreclosure cases to stay sale pending redemption decision.

Abstract

Consolidated appeals from equity suits dispute ownership and redemption rights to railway company bonds, involving an assignee seeking to redeem bonds sold to another party amid foreclosure proceedings. The appellate court initially affirmed lower court decrees but, on rehearing petitions, denied rehearing in one case while vacating affirmances in others to restore them for further orders and stay sales pending redemption decisions.

Opinion of the court

Majority
opinion
PER CURIAMjoined by SANBORN, THAYER
  • Both judges agreed appellants' ownership claim untenable
  • One judge upheld redemption right under Iowa decree
  • Rehearing in Iowa case denied as decree provides full relief
  • Rehearing in Nebraska cases granted to stay sale pending redemption decision

Jurisdiction

not challenged
Subject matter
Appeals in suits in equity from circuit courts
Jurisdictional facts
  • Appeals from decrees in equity suits in circuit courts for Northern district of Iowa and district of Nebraska

Procedural posture

Posture at trial
Decrees entered in equity suits
Posture on appeal
Direct appeal from circuit court decrees
Preserved issues
  • Ownership of bonds of Sioux City, O’Neill & Western Railway Company
  • Right to redeem bonds under decree in Iowa case

Legal categories

Business

Case record

Full case name
HUBBARD et al. v. TOD et al. SIOUX CITY, O’N. & W. R. CO. v. MANHATTAN TRUST CO. SIOUX CITY, O’N. & W. R. CO. et al. v. MANHATTAN TRUST CO.
Docket number
Nos. 505, 641, and 661
Court
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Trial court
Circuit court for the Northern district of Iowa and circuit court for the district of Nebraska
Decided
Opinion author
PER CURIAM
Opinion type
per curiam
Precedential status
precedential
Judges on panel
SANBORNTHAYER

Issues & holdings

2
Issues raised
2
affirmed
2
Holdings
Standard of review

de novo

Disposition rationale

Both judges agreed appellants' position on ownership was untenable; one judge upheld redemption right under Iowa decree

Preservation

Issue preserved for review

Standard of review

de novo

Disposition rationale

Judges divided: one upheld redemption right, one upheld sale title; no rehearing granted as Iowa decree already provides redemption relief

Preservation

Issue preserved for review

Holdings of the court

Petition for rehearing in Iowa case (No. 641)
Denied
Both judges agreed appellants' ownership claim untenable; one judge upheld redemption under Iowa decree, providing full relief; rehearing would serve no useful purpose
unanimousbinding precedent
Petition for rehearing in Nebraska cases (Nos. 505 and 661)
Granted; orders of affirmance vacated, cases restored to docket
To prevent sale under foreclosure decree until assignee decides whether to redeem bonds under Iowa decree
unanimousbinding precedent

Standards of review

  • Ownership and redemption rights of bonds — de novo Equity appeals reviewed de novo on questions of law

Timeline

4
Events
1,270
Days, incident to ruling
—
Span
factual eventcited in opinion

Interest calculation date for bond redemption under Iowa decree

Right to redeem bonds
factual eventcited in opinion

Sale of bonds to J. Kennedy Tod & Co.

Ownership of bonds
appeal eventcited in opinion

Circuit Court of Appeals affirms decrees without opinion by divided vote

Outcome: Decrees affirmed

All issues on appeal
appellate court
appeal eventcited in opinion

Court denies rehearing in Iowa case (No. 641) and grants rehearing in Nebraska cases (Nos. 505 and 661)

Outcome: Rehearing denied in part, granted in part

Rehearing petitions
appellate court

Facts & evidence

Key facts

4 facts
  1. Dispute over ownership of bonds of Sioux City, O’Neill & Western Railway Company
  2. Bonds sold to J. Kennedy Tod & Co. on September 26, 1893
  3. Assignee of Union Loan & Trust Company sought to redeem bonds under Iowa decree
  4. Foreclosure suit in Nebraska involving same bonds

Procedural history

3 steps
  1. Cases heard on appeal by two judges of Circuit Court of Appeals
  2. Decrees affirmed by divided court on April 15, 1896
  3. Appellants moved for rehearing

Objects of relevance

Bonds of Sioux City, O’Neill & Western Railway Company

Authorities

Cited authorities (2)

65 Fed. 559
citedprecedent
Trial court decree in Iowa case permitting redemption of bonds
68 Fed. 72
citedprecedent
Trial court proceeding in Nebraska foreclosure case

Related cases (2)

65 Fed. 559
prior appeal
Cited as trial court decree in Iowa case
68 Fed. 72
prior appeal
Cited as trial court proceeding in Nebraska case

Standards & doctrines

  • De novo review in equity appeals

Legal principles applied

  • Rehearing not granted if no useful purpose would be served
  • Appellate court authority to vacate orders and restore cases to docket
Index terms53
Summary terms
Legal mechanisms
Various actions
Various actors
Legal concepts
Legal outcomes
Legal issues
Legal procedures
Legal remedies
Legal evidence
Legal arguments
Legal defenses
Legal penalties
Legal procedural steps
Geo locations
Judges
Attorneys
Procedural terms
Substantive offenses
Entities and documentation
Legal actions
Action type
denied
Target
petition for rehearing
Appealed from
Circuit Court of Appeals
Context
Petition for rehearing in case No. 641 denied because existing decree provides full relief to appellant
Scope
full
Action type
vacated and annulled
Target
orders of affirmance
Appealed from
Circuit Court of Appeals
Context
Orders of affirmance in cases Nos. 505 and 661 vacated and cases restored to docket to prevent sale pending redemption decision
Scope
full
Further instructions
Cases restored to docket for further orders
Search facets
Parties
Judges
SanbornThayer
Courts
Locations