The Roma

Decided District Court, S. D. New York
Disposition
affirmed
full scope · unanimous
Scan to open on mobileScan to open on another device
Court
District Court, S. D. New York
Decided
Judge
ADAMS, District Judge
Posture
Trial in admiralty

Overview

Decree for the libellants, with an order of reference.

Case summary

This admiralty case involves a collision between the small passenger vessel Alberta M. and a hawser stretched across a slip by the steamship Roma in the Atlantic Basin, Brooklyn, on November 7, 1904. The Alberta, regularly using the slip for 18 years, was returning at dusk when it struck the hawser, damaging its pilot house and injuring two passengers. The owners of Alberta and the injured passengers sued for damages. The court held Roma negligent for obstructing the slip without adequate warning (e.g., a light on the hawser), as shouts were too late and in a foreign language. The court found Alberta not at fault, as its speed was reasonable and a lookout would not have averted the accident. Decree was entered for the libellants.

Abstract

A small passenger vessel collided with a hawser stretched across a slip by another steamship at dusk, damaging the pilot house and injuring two passengers. The owners of the damaged vessel and the injured passengers sued for damages, alleging negligence in obstructing the slip without adequate warning such as a light. The court held the obstructing vessel negligent, found the passenger vessel without fault due to reasonable speed and unavoidable circumstances, and entered a decree for the claimants.

Opinion of the court

Majority
opinion
ADAMS, District Judge
  • Roma negligent for not warning of hawser with light or timely notice
  • Alberta not contributorily negligent for speed or lack of lookout
  • Precedent supports liability for nighttime obstructions without warning

Jurisdiction

not challenged
Subject matter
Admiralty
Jurisdictional facts
  • Collision between vessels in navigable waters (Atlantic Basin, Brooklyn)

Procedural posture

Posture at trial
Trial in admiralty
Preserved issues
  • Negligence of Roma in obstructing slip
  • Negligence of Alberta in failing to observe hawser

Subsequent history

Petition for rehearing
not filed
Rehearing en banc
not filed
Petition for certiorari
not filed

Legal categories

Business

Case record

Full case name
THE ROMA.
Court
District Court, S. D. New York
Trial court judge
ADAMS, District Judge
Decided
Opinion author
ADAMS, District Judge
Opinion type
published
Precedential status
precedential
Judges on panel
ADAMS, District Judge

Issues & holdings

Holdings of the court

Whether Roma was negligent in obstructing slip without adequate warning
Roma was negligent for not placing a light on the hawser or otherwise notifying Alberta of its presence.
Vessels stretching hawsers across slips in nighttime without adequate warning are responsible for damages to careful navigators. Roma knew Alberta regularly occupied bulkhead at night, so had duty to give notice. Shouts were too late (within 100 feet) and in French, not immediately understood; a light would have been visible and conveyed danger.
unanimousbinding precedent
Whether Alberta was negligent in failing to observe hawser in time
Alberta was not at fault for excessive speed or lack of lookout.
Alberta's speed was not excessive (3.5-4 knots under one bell). Lack of lookout did not contribute; lookout would not have seen hawser better than master in pilot house 12 feet from stem, and warning would have been useless as hawser was above line of vision.
unanimousbinding precedent

Burden of proof

Prosecution burden
Preponderance of evidence (civil admiralty standard)
Burden met
true

Timeline

6
Events
204
Days, incident to ruling
—
Span
factual eventcited in opinion

Roma moored at pier 33 in Atlantic Basin, Brooklyn.

Established Roma's presence in slip before collision.

Negligence of Roma
Roma Pier 33, Atlantic Basin, Brooklyn not applicable
factual eventcited in opinion

After 4:00 PM, Roma stretched hawser across slip from after bitts to pier 34.

Outcome: Hawser obstructed slip.

Created obstruction leading to collision.

Negligence of Roma
Roma Slip between piers 33 and 34, Atlantic Basin, Brooklyn not applicable
factual eventcited in opinion

4:50 PM: Alberta left Bayonne for Atlantic Basin with passengers.

Alberta en route to slip where collision occurred.

Negligence of Alberta
Alberta M. Bayonne, New Jersey to Atlantic Basin, Brooklyn not applicable
factual eventcited in opinion

Around sunset (4:53 PM): Alberta entered slip, delayed by another vessel at basin gap.

Collision occurred in darkening conditions.

Negligence of AlbertaNegligence of Roma
Alberta M. Slip between piers 33 and 34, Atlantic Basin, Brooklyn not applicable
factual eventcited in opinion

Alberta within 100 feet of hawser: shouts from Roma warned of hawser; master reversed engine but struck hawser, damaging pilot house and injuring passengers.

Outcome: Collision and injuries.

Direct cause of damages.

Negligence of RomaNegligence of Alberta
Alberta M. · Roma Slip between piers 33 and 34, Atlantic Basin, Brooklyn not applicable
rulingcited in opinion

District Court issued decree for libellants, holding Roma negligent and Alberta not at fault.

Outcome: Decree for libellants with order of reference.

Final disposition of case.

Negligence of RomaNegligence of Alberta
ADAMS, District Judge District Court, S. D. New York trial court

Facts & evidence

Incident

Date
Location
Atlantic Basin, Brooklyn, New York (slip between piers 33 and 34)

Key facts

9 facts
  1. The Alberta M., a small steam passenger vessel, regularly occupied bulkhead at inner end of slip for 18 years, making daily trips between Brooklyn and Bayonne, New Jersey.
  2. The Roma, a transatlantic passenger steamer, moored at pier 33 since November 4, 1904.
  3. On November 7, 1904, after 4:00 PM, Roma stretched a hawser (6-7 inches circumference) across slip from her after bitts to pier 34, about 25 feet above water at ship and a few feet above water at pier.
  4. Alberta left Bayonne at 4:50 PM, entered slip around sunset (4:53 PM), with twilight ending 6:20-6:35 PM; darkness increased by structures on piers.
  5. As Alberta approached, shouts from Roma warned of hawser when Alberta was within about 100 feet; master stopped and reversed engine but struck hawser, damaging pilot house and injuring two passengers.
  6. Shouts were in French, not immediately understood by Alberta's master.
  7. Alberta was moving slowly (3.5-4 knots) under one bell, with full speed 7 knots; hawser was light (less than 2.5 inches diameter) and broke on impact.
  8. Roma had been slightly moved to let coal boat pass, but not enough to warn of hawser.
  9. Alberta had crew of three, no lookout forward.

Disputed questions

  • Whether shouts were timely and adequate warning
  • Whether Alberta's speed was excessive
  • Whether lack of lookout contributed to accident

Procedural history

1 steps
  1. Action brought by owners of Alberta and injured passengers to recover damages from collision.

Evidence in the record

Direct
  • Testimony about shouts given as Alberta within 100 feet of hawser
  • Observation that hawser was broken
Physical
  • Hawser (6-7 inches circumference, less than 2.5 inches diameter)
  • Damaged pilot house of Alberta
Testimonial
  • Master of Alberta's account of events
  • Witnesses to shouts from Roma
Circumstantial
  • Darkness and structures obscuring vision
  • Roma's knowledge of Alberta's regular use of slip

Jury

Sentencing

Objects of relevance

Hawser (6-7 inches circumference) stretched across slipPilot house of Alberta damaged in collision

Policy considerations

  • Safety in navigable waters requires adequate warning of obstructions
  • Regular users of waterways should be protected from unexpected hazards

Authorities

Cited authorities (2)

The Fulda (D. C.) 31 Fed. 351
followedprecedent
Cited for principle that vessels stretching hawsers across slips at night without adequate warning are liable for damages
Erie R. Co. v. Oceanic Steam Nav. Co. (D. C.) 121 Fed. 440
appliedprecedent
Cited for similar analysis on lookouts and warnings in obstruction cases

Related cases (2)

The Fulda (D. C.) 31 Fed. 351
precedent
Cited for principle that vessels obstructing slips at night without warning are liable.
Erie R. Co. v. Oceanic Steam Nav. Co. (D. C.) 121 Fed. 440
precedent
Cited for similar negligence analysis regarding lookouts and warnings.

Standards & doctrines

  • Precedent from The Fulda and Erie R. Co. v. Oceanic Steam Nav. Co. on obstruction liability

Legal principles applied

  • Vessels must provide adequate warning for nighttime obstructions
  • Lack of lookout not contributory if it would not have averted accident

Notable quotes

“It is settled that vessels stretching hawsers across slips in the nighttime without adequate warning are responsible for the damages caused thereby to careful navigators”
ADAMS, District Judge — Discussing legal principle for Roma's negligence
Establishes precedent for liability in obstruction cases
“I think that the Roma must be held in fault.”
ADAMS, District Judge — Conclusion on Roma's negligence
Direct holding on primary issue
Index terms64
Summary terms
Legal mechanisms
Various actions
Various actors
Legal concepts
Legal outcomes
Legal issues
Legal procedures
Legal remedies
Legal evidence
Legal arguments
Legal defenses
Legal penalties
Legal procedural steps
Geo locations
Judges
Attorneys
Procedural terms
Substantive offenses
Entities and documentation
Legal actions
Action type
affirmed
Target
Liability of Roma for negligence
Context
Court held Roma negligent for not warning of hawser, entering decree for libellants
Scope
full
Further instructions
Order of reference for damages assessment
Disposition vote
unanimous
Physical materials
Search facets
Parties
Judges
Adams
Courts
Locations