Foster v. Lincoln

Decided Circuit Court, D. Vermont
Disposition
affirmed
full scope · unanimous
Scan to open on mobileScan to open on another device
Court
Circuit Court, D. Vermont
Decided
Judge
WHEELER, District Judge
Posture
Suit brought by receiver to recover assessment from shareholders

Overview

Decree for the plaintiff. Benjamin F. Lincoln (through his personal representatives) and his five children are liable for the assessment on the Deming bank stock.

Case summary

This case involves shareholder liability under national banking laws. Benjamin F. Lincoln, president of the National Bank of Lyndon, Vermont, held stock in the First National Bank of Deming, New Mexico. On September 15, 1891, he learned through a telegram that the Deming bank urgently needed $5,000. Six days later, he transferred his Deming bank stock without consideration to his five children, including minors and a married woman. The Deming bank was insolvent at the time and failed on February 8, 1892. The receiver, Foster, brought suit to recover an 82% assessment laid by the comptroller of the currency. The court held that Lincoln made the transfer in contemplation of shareholder liability after having warning of the bank's financial trouble. Both Lincoln (through his estate) and his children were held liable—Lincoln because the voluntary transfer was voidable as to creditors, and the children because they assumed liability by becoming shareholders. The court entered a decree for the plaintiff.

Abstract

The bank president transferred his stock in an insolvent national bank to his children, including minors and a married woman, shortly after receiving warning of the bank's financial distress and without consideration. The court held the transfer voidable as to creditors, rendering the president liable through his estate and the children liable upon assuming shareholder status. A decree was entered holding them responsible for the comptroller's assessment on the stock.

Opinion of the court

Majority
opinion
WHEELER, District Judge
  • Shareholders of national banks are individually responsible for contracts, debts, and engagements of the association under Rev. St. U.S. § 5151
  • This liability attaches when the bank's obligations are entered into and cannot be impaired by transfer
  • Lincoln's transfer was voluntary and made after he had warning of the bank's financial straits, so it was made in contemplation of liability
  • The transfer is voidable at the instance of creditors represented by the receiver
  • Transferees succeed to the liabilities of the prior holder when they become stockholders
  • Liability survives to personal representatives under Rev. St. U.S. § 5152

Jurisdiction

not challenged
Subject matter
Federal question under national bank law
Jurisdictional facts
  • Case involves interpretation of U.S. Revised Statutes § 5151 and § 5152 governing national bank shareholder liability

Procedural posture

Posture at trial
Suit brought by receiver to recover assessment from shareholders

Subsequent history

Petition for rehearing
not filed
Rehearing en banc
not filed
Petition for certiorari
not filed

Legal categories

Business

Case record

Full case name
FOSTER v. LINCOLN et al.
Court
Circuit Court, D. Vermont
Decided
Opinion author
WHEELER, District Judge
Opinion type
published
Precedential status
precedential
Judges on panel
WHEELER, District Judge

Issues & holdings

Holdings of the court

Whether Benjamin F. Lincoln is liable for assessment on Deming bank stock after transferring it to his children
Lincoln is liable because the transfer was made in contemplation of shareholder liability after he had warning of the bank's financial straits
As a bank man, Lincoln must have known of shareholder liability under Rev. St. U.S. § 5151. He had warning from the telegram six days before the transfer. The transfer was voluntary without consideration. The statutes intend that liability should not be impaired by transfer, especially voluntary transfers. The transfer should be voidable at the instance of creditors represented by the receiver.
unanimousbinding precedent
Whether Lincoln's children (transferees) are liable for the assessment
The children are liable because liability was cast upon them by law when they became stockholders
Under national bank law, every person becoming a shareholder by transfer succeeds to all the rights and liabilities of the prior holder. No change shall be made which impairs the rights of existing creditors. The children became stockholders through the transfer and thus assumed the liability.
unanimousbinding precedent
Whether assets in hands of Lincoln's personal representatives are liable after his death
The assets in the hands of Lincoln's personal representatives are liable as he would have been
Under Rev. St. U.S. § 5152, liability survives to personal representatives.
unanimousbinding precedent

Statutory interpretation

2
Statute
Rev. St. U.S. § 5151
Question
Whether shareholder liability can be avoided by transfer of stock
Court's reading
Liability attaches when bank's obligations are entered into and cannot be impaired by transfer, especially voluntary transfers
Canons applied
Plain meaningProtection of creditors
no legislative history
Statute
Rev. St. U.S. § 5152
Question
Whether shareholder liability survives death
Court's reading
Liability survives to personal representatives
Canons applied
Plain meaning
no legislative history

Burden of proof

Prosecution burden
Preponderance of evidence (civil case)
Burden met
true

Timeline

4
Events
1,708
Days, incident to ruling
—
Span
factual eventcited in opinion

Telegram came to Lyndon bank urgently calling for $5,000 to be sent by telegraph in aid of Deming bank

Outcome: Lincoln became aware of Deming bank's financial straits

Provided warning of bank's insolvency six days before stock transfer

Whether transfer was made in contemplation of liability
Benjamin F. Lincoln · National Bank of Lyndon Lyndon, Vermont not applicable
factual eventcited in opinion

Lincoln transferred his Deming bank stock in equal parts to his five children without consideration

Outcome: Stock ownership transferred to children

Voluntary transfer made after warning of bank's financial trouble

Validity of transfer regarding shareholder liability
Benjamin F. Lincoln · Lincoln's five children not applicable
factual eventcited in opinion

First National Bank of Deming failed

Outcome: Bank became insolvent

Triggered assessment on shareholders

Shareholder liability for assessment
First National Bank of Deming Deming, New Mexico not applicable
rulingcited in opinion

Circuit Court issued decree for plaintiff, holding Lincoln and his children liable for assessment

Outcome: Decree for plaintiff

Established liability for voluntary transfers made in contemplation of bank insolvency

All issues regarding shareholder liability
WHEELER, District Judge · Foster (receiver) · Lincoln's personal representatives Circuit Court, D. Vermont trial court

Facts & evidence

Incident

Date
1891-09-15 to 1892-02-08
Location
First National Bank of Deming, New Mexico and National Bank of Lyndon, Vermont

Key facts

7 facts
  1. Benjamin F. Lincoln was president of National Bank of Lyndon, Vt. and held 25 shares in First National Bank of Deming, N.M.
  2. On September 15, 1891, a telegram urgently called for $5,000 to be sent by telegraph to aid the Deming bank, which came to Lincoln's knowledge
  3. On September 21, 1891, Lincoln transferred his Deming bank stock in equal parts to his five children without consideration
  4. The children included one married woman, two minors, and all were irresponsible for assessments
  5. The Deming bank was insolvent at the time of transfer with liabilities of about $150,000 to depositors and other banks
  6. The Deming bank failed on February 8, 1892
  7. Plaintiff Foster, as receiver, brought suit to recover an 82% assessment laid by the comptroller of the currency

Disputed questions

  • Whether Lincoln made the transfer in contemplation of shareholder liability

Procedural history

3 steps
  1. Suit brought by receiver to recover assessment from shareholders
  2. Case was ready for hearing when Benjamin F. Lincoln died
  3. His personal representatives entered to defend

Evidence in the record

Direct
  • Testimony of Lincoln about contemplating giving property to children
  • Testimony of cashier about bank's insolvency
Testimonial
  • Lincoln's testimony about his intent
  • Cashier's testimony about bank's financial condition
Documentary
  • Telegram calling for $5,000
  • Stock transfer records
Circumstantial
  • Timing of transfer six days after urgent telegram
  • Voluntary nature of transfer without consideration

Objects of relevance

Bank stock certificatesTelegram demanding $5,000Bank books recording stock transfers

Policy considerations

  • Protection of bank creditors from shareholders avoiding liability through transfers
  • Maintaining integrity of national banking system

Authorities

Cited authorities (6)

Rev. St. U.S. § 5151
appliedquotedprecedent
Provides that shareholders of national banking associations shall be held individually responsible for all contracts, debts, and engagements of the association
Richmond v. Irons, 121 U.S. 27, 7 Sup. Ct. 788
followedprecedent
Cited for principle that shareholder liability attaches when the contracts, debts, and engagements of the bank are entered into
Witters v. Sowles, 32 Fed. 767
followedprecedent
Cited for same principle as Richmond v. Irons regarding when shareholder liability attaches
Johnston v. Laflin, 103 U.S. 804
followedquotedprecedent
Cited for principle that entry of transfer on bank books is necessary to protect seller against subsequent liability as stockholder
Bowden v. Johnson, 107 U.S. 251, 2 Sup. Ct. 246
appliedprecedent
Cited for principle that transfer should be voidable at instance of creditors
Rev. St. U.S. § 5152
appliedprecedent
Provides that liability survives to personal representatives after shareholder's death

Related cases (4)

Richmond v. Irons, 121 U.S. 27, 7 Sup. Ct. 788
precedent
Cited for principle that shareholder liability attaches when bank's obligations are entered into
Witters v. Sowles, 32 Fed. 767
precedent
Cited for same principle as Richmond v. Irons
Johnston v. Laflin, 103 U.S. 804
precedent
Cited for principle that entry of transfer on bank books protects seller against subsequent liability
Bowden v. Johnson, 107 U.S. 251, 2 Sup. Ct. 246
precedent
Cited for principle that transfer should be voidable at instance of creditors

Statutes

  • Rev. St. U.S. § 5151 (shareholder individual responsibility)
  • Rev. St. U.S. § 5152 (liability survives to personal representatives)

Standards & doctrines

  • Shareholder liability attaches when bank obligations are entered into
  • Transferees succeed to liabilities of prior holder
  • Transfers that impair creditor rights are voidable

Legal principles applied

  • Creditors have right to rely on responsibility of shareholders as shown by bank books
  • No change shall be made in articles that impairs rights of existing creditors
  • Entry of transfer on bank books protects seller against subsequent liability

Notable quotes

“The defendant Benjamin F. Lincoln appears to have been under liability to the creditors of the bank when this transfer was made.”
WHEELER, District Judge — Discussing timing of liability relative to transfer
Establishes that liability existed at time of transfer
“As a bank man he must have known of this liability, and he had warning of the straits of the bank by the telegram six days before the transfer.”
WHEELER, District Judge — Analyzing Lincoln's knowledge and intent
Supports finding that transfer was made in contemplation of liability
“The transfer should be so now at the instance of the creditors, represented by the receiver.”
WHEELER, District Judge — Applying voidability principle to this case
Applies precedent to allow receiver to challenge transfer
Index terms76
Summary terms
Legal mechanisms
Various actions
Various actors
Legal concepts
Legal outcomes
Legal issues
Legal procedures
Legal remedies
Legal evidence
Legal arguments
Legal defenses
Legal penalties
Legal procedural steps
Geo locations
Judges
Attorneys
Procedural terms
Substantive offenses
Entities and documentation
Legal actions
Action type
affirmed
Target
Plaintiff's claim for assessment recovery
Context
Court issued decree for plaintiff, holding defendants liable for assessment on bank stock
Scope
full
Disposition vote
unanimous
Search facets
Parties
Judges
Wheeler
Courts
Locations
Statutes cited