King v. Lewis

No. 444
Decided Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Disposition
affirmed
full scope · unanimous
Scan to open on mobileScan to open on another device
Court
Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division
Decided
Posture
Judgment entered in trial court
Plaintiffs (1)
KING et al.
J. W. Jenner
v.
Defendant (1)
LEWIS
Darius Dirlam

Overview

Judgment affirmed.

Case summary

This is a brief appellate decision from the Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, dated October 26, 1896. The case involves plaintiffs KING et al. appealing a judgment from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, against defendant LEWIS. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment without issuing a written opinion, providing no details on the factual background, legal issues, or reasoning. Attorneys J. W. Jenner represented the plaintiffs, and Darius Dirlam represented the defendant.

Abstract

Plaintiffs appealed a judgment from the federal trial court against the defendant. The appellate court affirmed the judgment without issuing a written opinion or detailing the factual background, legal issues, or reasoning.

Opinion of the court

Majority
opinion
  • Judgment affirmed without opinion.

Jurisdiction

not challenged
Jurisdictional facts
  • Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division

Procedural posture

Posture at trial
Judgment entered in trial court
Posture on appeal
Direct appeal

Legal categories

Business

Case record

Full case name
KING et al. v. LEWIS.
Docket number
No. 444
Court
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Trial court
Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division
Decided
Opinion type
unpublished
Precedential status
non-precedential

Issues & holdings

No issues recorded for this case.

Timeline

appeal eventcited in opinion

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit affirms the judgment of the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division.

Outcome: Judgment affirmed

Final disposition of the appeal without a written opinion.

Circuit Court of Appeals judges · J. W. Jenner (plaintiffs' attorney) · Darius Dirlam (defendant's attorney) appellate court

Facts & evidence

Key facts

1 facts
  1. No factual details provided in the opinion text.

Authorities

Legal principles applied

  • Appellate court may affirm without opinion
Index terms32
Summary terms
Legal mechanisms
Various actions
Various actors
Legal concepts
Legal outcomes
Legal issues
Legal procedures
Legal remedies
Legal evidence
Legal arguments
Legal defenses
Legal penalties
Legal procedural steps
Geo locations
Attorneys
Procedural terms
Legal actions
Action type
affirmed
Target
trial court judgment
Appealed from
Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division
Context
Appellate court affirmed the judgment of the trial court without issuing an opinion.
Scope
full
Disposition vote
unanimous
Search facets
Parties
Courts
Locations