Healey v. United States

160 U. S. R., 136
Decided Supreme Court of the United States
Disposition
Decided
Scan to open on mobileScan to open on another device
Court
Court of Claims
Decided
Judge
Mr. Justice Harlan
Posture
Judgment for the claimant in the Court of Claims
Defendant (1)
The United States
v.
Claimant (1)
Benjamin Healey

Overview

The judgment of the Court of Claims is reversed.

Case summary

Benjamin Healey sought to recover half of the purchase price paid for desert land, contending that the $2.50 per acre rate charged by the General Land Office under Revised Statutes § 2357 was inapplicable to his entry. The Court of Claims ruled in favor of the claimant, finding the higher price inapplicable and allowing recovery despite the lack of protest. The Supreme Court reversed, holding that the law in force at the time of the entry governed the price and that the subsequent Act of 1891 did not retroactively lower the price for pending entries.

Abstract

Claimant sought to recover half the purchase price paid for desert land, arguing that a higher rate per acre charged by the General Land Office was inapplicable to the entry. The Court of Claims ruled in favor of recovery despite no protest, but the Supreme Court reversed, holding that the price was governed by the law in force at the time of entry and that a subsequent act did not retroactively lower the price for pending entries. The judgment of the Court of Claims was reversed.

Opinion of the court

Majority
opinion
Mr. Justice Harlan
  • The Act of 1891 does not apply retroactively to desert land entries initiated before its passage.
  • The price of alternate reserved railroad lands is governed by the law in effect at the time of the entry.

Procedural posture

Posture at trial
Judgment for the claimant in the Court of Claims
Posture on appeal
Appeal by the United States from the Court of Claims

Legal categories

Estate Planning and Real Estate

Case record

Full case name
Benjamin Healey v. The United States
Docket number
160 U. S. R., 136
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Trial court
Court of Claims
Decided
Opinion author
Mr. Justice Harlan
Opinion type
published
Precedential status
binding
Judges on panel
Harlan

Issues & holdings

1
Issues raised
1
reversed
1
Holdings
Standard of review

de novo

Disposition rationale

The Supreme Court held that the law in force at the time of entry governed the price, and the act of 1891 did not retroactively authorize a lower price for proceedings begun before its passage.

Holdings of the court

Applicability of price requirements for desert land entries
The price of $2.50 per acre for alternate reserved railroad lands remained applicable to entries initiated before the Act of 1891.
The Act of 1891 did not authorize lands in dispute to be sold at $1.25 per acre where proceedings were initiated prior to its passage; the price was governed by the law in force at the time of entry.
binding precedent

Timeline

No timeline recorded.

Facts & evidence

Incident

Date
Location
United States

Key facts

5 facts
  1. Claimant filed a declaration of intention to reclaim a tract of desert land.
  2. The land was part of the alternate reserved sections along a railroad line.
  3. The General Land Office required a payment of $2.50 per acre under Revised Statutes § 2357.
  4. Claimant paid the $2.50 per acre without protest.
  5. Claimant later sought to recover half of the purchase money, arguing the price should have been $1.25 per acre.

Authorities

Statutes

  • Revised Statutes § 2357
  • Desert Land Act of 1877
  • Act of 1891
Index terms15
Summary terms
Legal mechanisms
Legal issues
Search facets
Parties
Judges
Harlan
Courts
Statutes cited
Other recorded fields

Legal actions

Action type
reversed
Target
trial court judgment
Context
The Supreme Court reversed the Court of Claims decision which had allowed the claimant to recover the difference in purchase price.