King v. Sperry's Adm'r

No. 444
Decided Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Disposition
affirmed
full scope
Scan to open on mobileScan to open on another device
Court
Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio
Decided
Posture
Judgment from trial court
Plaintiff in error (1)
King
J. W. Jenner
v.
Defendant in error (1)
Sperry’s Adm’r.
Darius Dirlam

Overview

Affirmed.

Case summary

This is a brief appellate decision from the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirming a judgment from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio. The case involves King as plaintiff in error (appellant) and Sperry’s Adm’r. as defendant in error (appellee). No opinion was issued, and the lower court's judgment was affirmed without detailed reasoning.

Abstract

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio in a case brought by the plaintiff in error against the defendant's administrator. No opinion was issued, and the lower court's judgment was affirmed without detailed reasoning.

Opinion of the court

Majority
opinion
  • No opinion issued
  • Judgment affirmed

Jurisdiction

not challenged
Jurisdictional facts
  • Appeal taken from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio

Procedural posture

Posture at trial
Judgment from trial court
Posture on appeal
Direct appeal

Legal categories

Business

Case record

Full case name
KING v. SPERRY’S ADM’R.
Docket number
No. 444
Court
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Trial court
Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio
Decided
Opinion type
unpublished
Precedential status
non-precedential

Issues & holdings

No issues recorded for this case.

Timeline

appeal eventcited in opinion

Appeal filed in Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Outcome: Affirmed

Final disposition of the appeal

King · Sperry’s Adm’r. · J. W. Jenner · Darius Dirlam appellate court

Facts & evidence

Procedural history

1 steps
  1. Case appealed from Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio

Authorities

Legal principles applied

  • Deference to trial court decisions
Index terms36
Summary terms
Legal mechanisms
Various actions
Various actors
Legal concepts
Legal outcomes
Legal issues
Legal procedures
Legal remedies
Legal procedural steps
Geo locations
Attorneys
Procedural terms
Legal actions
Action type
affirmed
Target
trial court judgment
Appealed from
Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio
Context
The appellate court affirmed the judgment of the lower court without issuing an opinion.
Scope
full
Search facets
Parties
Courts
Locations