United States v. Hewecker

Not specified
Decided Circuit Court, S. D. New York.
Disposition
sustained
full scope · unanimous
Scan to open on mobileScan to open on another device
Court
Circuit court in this district
Decided
Judge
BROWN, District Judge.
Posture
Demurrer to plea in abatement pending
Prosecution (1)
United States
Wallace Macfarlane, U. S. Atty., Max J. Koehler, Asst. U. S. Atty.
v.
Defendant (1)
Hewecker
Abram J. Rose, Alfred C. Pette
Decedent / victim: Edward J. Miller

Overview

The demurrer is overruled, and the plea in abatement, sustained. The indictment is barred by the three-year statute of limitations.

Case summary

In United States v. Hewecker, the defendant, a seaman, was indicted for shooting Edward J. Miller on board an American schooner in Havana harbor on January 17, 1892. Miller died from his wounds in a Havana hospital on January 21, 1892. The indictment was not found until March 10, 1896, more than three years later. During the intervening period, the defendant was imprisoned in Havana for an unrelated assault conviction. The defendant filed a plea in abatement arguing the indictment was barred by the three-year statute of limitations in section 1043 of the Revised Statutes. The government demurred. After certification to the Supreme Court was declined, the case was reargued before District Judge Brown. The court held: (1) the defendant was not a 'fugitive from justice' under section 1045 because he was imprisoned and did not voluntarily withdraw; (2) the offense was not 'willful murder' under section 1043 because at common law murder requires death within the same sovereignty and within a year and a day, and the applicable statute (section 5339) makes the offense a felony punishable by death but does not declare it murder; (3) therefore, the indictment was barred by the three-year limitation period. The demurrer was overruled and the plea in abatement sustained.

Abstract

The defendant, indicted years after shooting a victim who died in a foreign hospital aboard an American vessel, filed a plea in abatement claiming the three-year statute of limitations barred prosecution. The court ruled the defendant was not a fugitive from justice due to imprisonment rather than voluntary withdrawal, the offense did not qualify as willful murder under common law requirements or the applicable statute, and thus the indictment was time-barred. The demurrer was overruled, and the plea sustained.

Opinion of the court

Majority
opinion
BROWN, District Judge.
  • Defendant not a fugitive from justice as he was imprisoned during entire period
  • Offense not 'willful murder' under section 1043 due to death in foreign jurisdiction and lack of year-and-day limitation
  • Statute of limitations bars indictment filed more than three years after offense

Jurisdiction

not challenged
Subject matter
Admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the United States
Jurisdictional facts
  • Offense occurred on board the American schooner Rebecca J. Moulton in the harbor and bay of Havana, Cuba, within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the United States, and out of the jurisdiction of any particular state
  • Defendant was found and first brought into the Southern district of New York

Procedural posture

Posture at trial
Demurrer to plea in abatement pending
Posture on appeal
Not an appeal; case reargued before district judge after Supreme Court declined jurisdiction on certified question
Preserved issues
  • Whether case falls within three-years limitation of section 1043 or exception thereto
  • Whether prisoner can be treated as a fugitive from justice under section 1045

Legal categories

Criminal

Case record

Full case name
UNITED STATES v. HEWECKER.
Docket number
Not specified
Court
Circuit Court, S. D. New York.
Trial court
Circuit court in this district
Trial court judge
BROWN, District Judge.
Decided
Opinion author
BROWN, District Judge.
Opinion type
published
Precedential status
persuasive
Judges on panel
BROWN, District Judge.

Issues & holdings

2
Issues raised
2
affirmed
3
Holdings
Standard of review

de novo

Disposition rationale

Defendant was imprisoned in Havana during entire period, not a fugitive

Preservation

Issue preserved for review

Standard of review

de novo

Disposition rationale

Death occurred on land in foreign jurisdiction, not 'willful murder' at common law or under applicable statute

Preservation

Issue preserved for review

Holdings of the court

Fugitive from justice status
Defendant was not a fugitive from justice under section 1045
Defendant was imprisoned in Havana during entire statutory period; there was no voluntary withdrawal from jurisdiction; flight requires actual voluntary withdrawal
unanimousnon-binding
Willful murder exception to statute of limitations
The offense does not constitute 'willful murder' under section 1043
At common law, murder requires death within same sovereignty and within a year and a day; death occurred on land in foreign jurisdiction; section 5339 makes the offense a felony punishable by death but does not declare it murder and lacks the year-and-day limitation
unanimousnon-binding
Statute of limitations bar
The indictment is barred by the three-year limitation period in section 1043
Offense not willful murder exception; defendant not fugitive from justice; indictment filed more than three years after offense complete
unanimousnon-binding

Error analysis

  • Government's argument that offense constitutes willful murder exempt from statute of limitations — legal · error foundNot applicable as error relates to legal interpretation · not applicable
  • Government's argument that defendant was fugitive from justice — legal · error foundNot applicable as error relates to legal interpretation · not applicable

Statutory interpretation

3
Statute
Section 1043 of the Revised Statutes
Question
Whether 'willful murder' includes cases where death occurs on land in foreign jurisdiction
Court's reading
'Willful murder' means murder in its strict legal sense at common law, requiring death within same sovereignty and within a year and a day
Canons applied
Plain meaningRule of lenity
Statute
Section 1045 of the Revised Statutes
Question
Meaning of 'fleeing from justice'
Court's reading
Requires actual voluntary withdrawal from jurisdiction; imprisonment does not constitute fleeing
Canons applied
Plain meaning
Statute
Section 5339 of the Revised Statutes
Question
Whether offense described in third clause constitutes 'murder'
Court's reading
Third clause creates a felony punishable by death but not murder; lacks year-and-day limitation and grammatical connection to 'commits murder' in first line
Canons applied
Grammatical constructionReference to original act of 1825

Burden of proof

Prosecution burden
Beyond a reasonable doubt for criminal charges
Burden met
false

Standards of review

  • Interpretation of statutes and legal definitions — de novo Questions of statutory interpretation and legal definitions are reviewed de novo

Timeline

6
Events
1,788
Days, incident to ruling
—
Span
factual eventcited in opinion

Defendant Hewecker maliciously shot and wounded Edward J. Miller on board the American schooner Rebecca J. Moulton in Havana harbor, Cuba

Initiating event of the alleged crime

Hewecker · Edward J. Miller On board American schooner Rebecca J. Moulton in Havana harbor, Cuba
1892-01-17 to 1896-03-10factual eventcited in opinion

Defendant confined in prison at Havana, Cuba under a charge and conviction for an assault

Defendant was not a fugitive from justice during the statutory period

Hewecker Prison at Havana, Cuba
factual eventcited in opinion

Edward J. Miller died from his wounds in a hospital at Havana, Cuba

Death completes the offense; statute of limitations period begins

Edward J. Miller Hospital at Havana, Cuba
procedural eventcited in opinion

Indictment found by grand jury of circuit court

Outcome: Indictment filed

Formal charging document filed more than three years after Miller's death

Grand jury trial court
procedural eventcited in opinion

Supreme Court dismissed certificate and declined to entertain jurisdiction on certified question

Outcome: Certificate dismissed

Supreme Court refused to answer certified question, returning case to circuit court

Supreme Court supreme court
procedural eventcited in opinion

District Judge Brown issues opinion overruling demurrer and sustaining plea in abatement

Outcome: Demurrer overruled, plea in abatement sustained

Final ruling that indictment is barred by statute of limitations

BROWN, District Judge trial court

Facts & evidence

Incident

Date
Location
On board the American schooner Rebecca J. Moulton, in the harbor and bay of Havana, Cuba

Key facts

5 facts
  1. Defendant Hewecker maliciously shot and wounded Edward J. Miller on January 17, 1892
  2. Miller died from the wound in a hospital at Havana on January 21, 1892
  3. Indictment was not found until March 10, 1896, more than three years after Miller's death
  4. From January 17, 1892 until indictment date, defendant was confined in prison at Havana, Cuba under a charge and conviction for an assault
  5. Defendant was not a fugitive from justice during this period

Disputed questions

  • Whether the offense constitutes 'willful murder' under section 1043
  • Whether defendant was a 'fugitive from justice' under section 1045

Procedural history

7 steps
  1. March 10, 1896: Indictment found
  2. Plea in abatement filed by defendant
  3. Government demurrer to plea
  4. Argument heard before circuit judge and district judge who failed to agree
  5. Question certified to Supreme Court at request of U.S. counsel
  6. October 26, 1896: Supreme Court dismissed certificate and declined jurisdiction
  7. Case remanded to circuit court and reargued before district judge

Evidence in the record

Challenged
  • Evidence type: Indictment · Challenge basis: Statute of limitations · Trial court ruling: excluded · Reasoning: Indictment filed more than three years after offense; not within willful murder exception; defendant not fugitive from justice · Challenged on appeal: false · Appellate outcome: not applicable

Objects of relevance

American schooner Rebecca J. Moulton (location of shooting)Hospital at Havana (location of death)

Authorities

Cited authorities (5)

U. S. v. Brown, 2 Low. 267, Fed. Cas. No. 14,665
followedprecedent
Cited for principle that imprisonment does not constitute fleeing from justice
Ball v. U. S., 140 U. S. 118
followedquotedprecedent
Cited for common law requirement that death must occur within same jurisdiction as stroke for murder
at 140 U. S. 133
U. S. v. McGill, 4 Dall. 426
followedquotedprecedent
Cited for holding that both stroke and death must occur on high seas for murder jurisdiction
U. S. v. Armstrong, 2 Curt. 446, Fed. Cas. No. 14,467
followedquotedprecedent
Cited for statement that offense under statute is 'not strictly murder' when death occurs on land
U. S. v. Wiltberger, 5 Wheat. 76
followedquotedprecedent
Cited for principle that penal statutes must be interpreted strictly according to plain meaning

Statutes

  • Section 1043 Rev. St. (three-year limitation for capital offenses except willful murder)
  • Section 1045 Rev. St. (exception for persons fleeing from justice)
  • Section 5339 Rev. St. (punishment for murder and related felonies on waters)

Standards & doctrines

  • Common law definition of murder
  • Statutory interpretation canons: plain meaning, rule of lenity

Legal principles applied

  • Rule of lenity in interpreting penal statutes
  • Plain meaning rule in statutory interpretation
Index terms65
Summary terms
Legal mechanisms
Various actions
Various actors
Legal concepts
Legal outcomes
Legal issues
Legal procedures
Legal remedies
Legal evidence
Legal arguments
Legal defenses
Legal penalties
Legal procedural steps
Geo locations
Judges
Attorneys
Procedural terms
Substantive offenses
Entities and documentation
Legal actions
Action type
sustained
Target
Plea in abatement
Appealed from
Circuit court
Context
Court sustained the plea in abatement, holding the indictment barred by statute of limitations
Scope
full
Disposition vote
unanimous
Action type
overruled
Target
Demurrer
Appealed from
Government
Context
Court overruled the government's demurrer to the plea in abatement
Scope
full
Disposition vote
unanimous
Search facets
Parties
Judges
Brown
Courts
Locations
Statutes cited