Richardson v. International Pavement Co.

No. 36
Decided Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Disposition
dismissed
full scope · Unanimous
Scan to open on mobileScan to open on another device
Court
Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Decided
Posture
Unknown
Appellant (1)
RICHARDSON
v.
Appellee (1)
INTERNATIONAL PAVEMENT CO.

Overview

The appeal is dismissed pursuant to the twentieth rule.

Case summary

This case involves an appeal by Richardson against International Pavement Co. from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to the Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. The appellate court dismissed the appeal pursuant to the twentieth rule, indicating a procedural dismissal without reaching substantive issues. The decision was issued on September 21, 1896, as case number 36.

Abstract

The case involves an appeal from a federal circuit court to the circuit court of appeals. The appellate court dismissed the appeal pursuant to the twentieth rule without addressing substantive issues.

Opinion of the court

Majority
opinion
  • Appeal dismissed procedurally under the twentieth rule

Jurisdiction

not challenged
Jurisdictional facts
  • Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

Procedural posture

Posture at trial
Unknown
Posture on appeal
Direct appeal

Legal categories

Business

Case record

Full case name
RICHARDSON v. INTERNATIONAL PAVEMENT CO.
Docket number
No. 36
Court
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Trial court
Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Decided
Opinion type
published
Precedential status
precedential

Issues & holdings

1
Issues raised
1
dismissed
1
Holdings
Standard of review

Procedural rule application

Disposition rationale

Dismissed based on procedural grounds under the twentieth rule

Preservation

Issue preserved for review

Holdings of the court

Appeal dismissal
The appeal is dismissed pursuant to the twentieth rule
The court applied the twentieth rule to dismiss the appeal procedurally
Unanimousbinding precedent

Error analysis

  • Procedural error leading to dismissal under the twentieth rule — procedural · error foundNot applicable as dismissal is the outcome · not applicable

Standards of review

  • Procedural dismissal under the twentieth rule — de novo Application of court rules is reviewed de novo

Timeline

appeal eventcited in opinion

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit dismisses the appeal pursuant to the twentieth rule

Outcome: Appeal dismissed

Final disposition of the appeal based on procedural rule

Procedural dismissal
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit appellate court

Facts & evidence

Procedural history

2 steps
  1. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
  2. Dismissed pursuant to the twentieth rule

Authorities

Statutes

  • Twentieth rule (procedural court rule)

Standards & doctrines

  • De novo review of procedural rule application

Legal principles applied

  • Court rules must be followed for appeal proceedings

Notable quotes

“Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United Stales for Ihe Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Dismissed pursuant to the twentieth rule.”
majority — Majority opinion dismissing the appeal
States the procedural basis for dismissal
Index terms21
Summary terms
Legal mechanisms
Various actions
Various actors
Legal concepts
Legal outcomes
Legal issues
Legal procedures
Legal remedies
Legal procedural steps
Geo locations
Procedural terms
Legal actions
Action type
dismissed
Target
Appeal
Appealed from
Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Context
The Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal pursuant to the twentieth rule
Scope
full
Disposition vote
Unanimous
Search facets
Parties
Courts
Statutes cited