Staberg v. Oliver Min. Co.

No. 815
Decided Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Disposition
affirmed
full scope · Unanimous
Scan to open on mobileScan to open on another device
Court
Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota
Decided
Posture
Judgment from trial court
Plaintiff in error (1)
Staberg
John Rustgard
v.
Defendant in error (1)
Oliver Min. Co.
William W. Billson, Chester A. Congdon, Daniel A. Dickinson

Overview

Affirmed, with costs.

Case summary

Staberg v. Oliver Min. Co. is an 1896 appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. The appellate court issued a brief, unpublished opinion affirming the trial court's judgment with costs, without providing any factual background, legal reasoning, or discussion of issues. The case involved Staberg as plaintiff in error (appellant) and Oliver Min. Co. as defendant in error (appellee), with John Rustgard representing the appellant and William W. Billson, Chester A. Congdon, and Daniel A. Dickinson representing the appellee.

Abstract

The case is an appeal from a federal circuit court to the circuit court of appeals, with the appellant represented by one attorney and the appellee by three. The appellate court issued a brief, unpublished opinion affirming the trial court's judgment with costs. No factual background, legal reasoning, or discussion of issues was provided.

Opinion of the court

Majority
opinion
  • Affirmed trial court judgment with costs

Jurisdiction

not challenged
Jurisdictional facts
  • Error proceeding from Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota

Procedural posture

Posture at trial
Judgment from trial court
Posture on appeal
Direct appeal via writ of error

Legal categories

Business

Case record

Full case name
STABERG v. OLIVER MIN. CO.
Docket number
No. 815
Court
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Trial court
Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota
Decided
Opinion type
unpublished
Precedential status
non-precedential

Issues & holdings

1
Issues raised
1
affirmed
1
Holdings
Standard of review

Not specified

Disposition rationale

No opinion provided; affirmed with costs

Preservation

Issue preserved for review

Holdings of the court

Affirmance of trial court judgment
Trial court judgment affirmed with costs
No reasoning provided in opinion
Unanimousnon-binding

Error analysis

  • No specific errors alleged in opinion — procedural · no error foundnot applicable

Standards of review

  • Affirmance of trial court judgment — Not specified No standard of review discussed in opinion

Timeline

appeal eventcited in opinion

Circuit Court of Appeals affirms trial court judgment with costs

Outcome: Affirmed

Final disposition of appeal

Affirmance of trial court judgment
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit appellate court

Facts & evidence

Key facts

1 facts
  1. No factual details provided in opinion

Procedural history

1 steps
  1. Case appealed from Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota

Authorities

Legal principles applied

  • Appellate court may affirm without opinion
Index terms38
Summary terms
Legal mechanisms
Various actions
Various actors
Legal concepts
Legal outcomes
Legal issues
Legal procedures
Legal remedies
Legal evidence
Legal arguments
Legal defenses
Legal penalties
Legal procedural steps
Geo locations
Attorneys
Procedural terms
Legal actions
Action type
affirmed
Target
trial court judgment
Appealed from
Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota
Context
Circuit Court of Appeals affirms trial court judgment with costs without opinion
Scope
full
Disposition vote
Unanimous
Search facets
Parties
Courts
Locations