Prather v. United States

No. 546
Decided Filed Supreme Court of the United States
Disposition
dismissed
full scope · unanimous
Scan to open on mobileScan to open on another device
Court
Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia
Filed
Decided
Judge
The Chief Justice
Posture
Judgment from Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia
Defendant (1)
Prather
Mr. II. E. Davis, Mr. Jeremiah M. Wilson
v.
Plaintiff (1)
United States
Mr. Solicitor General

Overview

Writ of error dismissed.

Case summary

Prather v. United States is a Supreme Court case from 1896 involving a writ of error from the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. The United States moved to dismiss the writ, arguing lack of appellate jurisdiction. The Supreme Court, per the Chief Justice, found the case materially identical to Chapman v. United States, which had just been decided and held that appellate jurisdiction was lacking. Accordingly, the Court sustained the motion and dismissed the writ of error.

Abstract

The Supreme Court addressed a motion to dismiss a writ of error from the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia based on lack of appellate jurisdiction. The case was found materially identical to a recently decided case holding that appellate jurisdiction was lacking. The motion was sustained, and the writ of error was dismissed.

Opinion of the court

Majority
opinion
The Chief Justice
  • Appellate jurisdiction lacking
  • Follows Chapman v. United States
  • Writ of error dismissed

Jurisdiction

challenged
Jurisdictional holding
Appellate jurisdiction lacking; writ of error dismissed
Jurisdictional facts
  • Writ of error to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia

Procedural posture

Posture at trial
Judgment from Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia
Posture on appeal
Direct appeal via writ of error
Preserved issues
  • Appellate jurisdiction

Legal categories

Criminal

Case record

Full case name
PRATHER v. UNITED STATES
Docket number
No. 546
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Trial court
Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia
Filed
Decided
Opinion author
The Chief Justice
Opinion type
published
Precedential status
precedential
Judges on panel
The Chief Justice

Issues & holdings

1
Issues raised
1
dismissed
1
Holdings
Standard of review

De novo

Disposition rationale

Lack of appellate jurisdiction, following Chapman v. United States

Preservation

Issue preserved for review

Holdings of the court

Appellate jurisdiction
The Supreme Court lacks appellate jurisdiction; writ of error dismissed
The case is materially indistinguishable from Chapman v. United States, which held that appellate jurisdiction was lacking
unanimousbinding precedent

Standards of review

  • Appellate jurisdiction — de novo Jurisdictional questions reviewed de novo

Timeline

Procedural path

Case submittedWrit dismissed
2
Events
28
Days, incident to ruling
—
Span
filingcited in opinion

Case submitted to the Supreme Court

Prather · United States · Supreme Court appellate court
rulingcited in opinion

Supreme Court dismisses writ of error for lack of appellate jurisdiction

Outcome: Writ of error dismissed

Disposition based on jurisdictional grounds following Chapman v. United States

Appellate jurisdiction
The Chief Justice · Supreme Court appellate court

Facts & evidence

Procedural history

2 steps
  1. Case submitted on November 2, 1896
  2. Motion to dismiss writ of error filed

Authorities

Cited authorities (1)

Chapman v. United States
followedprecedent
Cited as controlling precedent on appellate jurisdiction
at ante, 436 just decided, ante, 436

Related cases (1)

Chapman v. United States
prior appeal
Appellate jurisdiction lacking

Standards & doctrines

  • De novo review of jurisdictional questions

Legal principles applied

  • Following precedent (Chapman v. United States) on jurisdictional matters
Index terms43
Summary terms
Legal mechanisms
Various actions
Various actors
Legal concepts
Legal outcomes
Legal issues
Legal procedures
Legal remedies
Legal arguments
Legal defenses
Legal penalties
Legal procedural steps
Judges
Attorneys
Procedural terms
Entities and documentation
Legal actions
Action type
dismissed
Target
writ of error
Appealed from
Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia
Context
Supreme Court dismisses writ of error for lack of appellate jurisdiction, following Chapman v. United States
Scope
full
Disposition vote
unanimous
Search facets
Parties
Courts
Practice areas
Other index terms