Cockrill v. Woodson

No. 883
Decided Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Disposition
dismissed
full scope · unanimous
Scan to open on mobileScan to open on another device
Court
Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri
Decided
Posture
Judgment from Circuit Court
Plaintiff in error (1)
Cockrill
v.
Defendants in error (1)
Woodson et al.
Ben. J. Woodson

Overview

The appeal was dismissed with costs pursuant to the sixteenth rule on motion of counsel for defendants in error.

Case summary

This case involved an appeal by Cockrill from a judgment of the Circuit Court for the Western District of Missouri. The Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit docketed and dismissed the appeal with costs pursuant to the sixteenth rule, on motion of counsel for the defendants in error (Woodson et al.). No substantive opinion was issued; the disposition was purely procedural based on court rules.

Abstract

The case involved an appeal from a circuit court judgment that was docketed and dismissed by the court of appeals pursuant to a specific court rule. The dismissal was granted on motion by counsel for the defendants in error. No substantive opinion was issued, and the disposition was purely procedural with costs imposed.

Opinion of the court

Majority
opinion
  • Appeal dismissed with costs pursuant to sixteenth rule
  • No substantive opinion issued

Jurisdiction

not challenged
Jurisdictional facts
  • Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri

Procedural posture

Posture at trial
Judgment from Circuit Court
Posture on appeal
Writ of error
Preserved issues
  • Dismissal pursuant to sixteenth rule

Legal categories

Business

Case record

Full case name
COCKRILL v. WOODSON et al.
Docket number
No. 883
Court
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Trial court
Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri
Decided

Issues & holdings

1
Issues raised
1
dismissed
1
Holdings
Standard of review

Procedural rule application

Disposition rationale

Dismissed with costs on motion of counsel for defendants in error pursuant to the sixteenth rule

Preservation

Issue preserved for review

Holdings of the court

Appeal dismissal
The appeal is dismissed with costs pursuant to the sixteenth rule
Granted on motion of counsel for defendants in error based on procedural rule
binding precedent

Error analysis

  • Procedural dismissal under sixteenth rule — procedural · no error foundnot applicable

Standards of review

  • Dismissal pursuant to sixteenth rule — procedural rule application Application of court rules for dismissal

Timeline

appeal eventcited in opinion

Circuit Court of Appeals docketed and dismissed the case with costs pursuant to the sixteenth rule on motion of counsel for defendants in error

Outcome: Case dismissed with costs

Final disposition of the appeal based on procedural rule

Circuit Court of Appeals · Ben. J. Woodson appellate court

Facts & evidence

Procedural history

1 steps
  1. Case docketed and dismissed with costs pursuant to the sixteenth rule on motion of counsel for defendants in error

Authorities

Statutes

  • Sixteenth rule of Circuit Court of Appeals

Standards & doctrines

  • Procedural rule application for dismissal

Legal principles applied

  • Courts may dismiss appeals based on procedural rules
Index terms29
Summary terms
Legal mechanisms
Various actions
Various actors
Legal concepts
Legal outcomes
Legal issues
Legal procedures
Legal remedies
Legal arguments
Legal defenses
Legal penalties
Legal procedural steps
Judges
Attorneys
Procedural terms
Legal actions
Action type
dismissed
Target
appeal
Appealed from
Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri
Context
Appeal docketed and dismissed with costs pursuant to the sixteenth rule on motion of counsel for defendants in error
Scope
full
Disposition vote
unanimous
Search facets
Parties
Courts
Statutes cited