Richardson v. American Pin Co.

No. 45
Decided Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Disposition
dismissed
full scope · unanimous
Scan to open on mobileScan to open on another device
Court
Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Connecticut
Decided
Appellant (1)
Richardson
J. Bonsall Taylor, William Strawbridge
v.
Appellee (1)
American Pin Co.
George E. Terry

Overview

The appeal was dismissed by consent, pursuant to the twentieth rule.

Case summary

This case involved an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Connecticut to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The appeal was dismissed by consent of the parties pursuant to the twentieth rule of the court, indicating a voluntary termination of the appeal without a decision on the merits.

Abstract

The case involved an appeal from a district court to the circuit court of appeals. The appeal was dismissed by consent of the parties pursuant to the court's twentieth rule. This resulted in a voluntary termination without a decision on the merits.

Opinion of the court

Majority
opinion
  • Appeal dismissed by consent pursuant to the twentieth rule.

Legal categories

Business

Case record

Full case name
RICHARDSON v. AMERICAN PIN CO.
Docket number
No. 45
Court
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Trial court
Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Connecticut
Decided
Opinion type
per curiam
Precedential status
non-precedential

Issues & holdings

No issues recorded for this case.

Timeline

No timeline recorded.

Facts & evidence

No factual record available.

Authorities

Legal principles applied

  • Parties may consent to dismiss an appeal under court rules
Index terms40
Summary terms
Legal mechanisms
Various actions
Various actors
Legal concepts
Legal outcomes
Legal issues
Legal procedures
Legal remedies
Legal procedural steps
Geo locations
Attorneys
Procedural terms
Entities and documentation
Legal actions
Action type
dismissed
Target
appeal
Appealed from
Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Connecticut
Context
The appeal was dismissed by consent of the parties pursuant to the twentieth rule of the Circuit Court of Appeals.
Scope
full
Disposition vote
unanimous
Search facets
Parties
Courts
Locations
Statutes cited